Sullivan

(HC) Andrus v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20201:19-cv-01540California891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON A. ANDRUS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01540-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO

v. EXHAUST CLAIMS J. SULLIVAN, RESPONSE DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS Respondent. ECF No. 1 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE

17 Petitioner Jason A. Andrus, a state prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Petitioner claims that his prison’s delayed service of a rules violation report caused him to lose 121 days of credit. Id. at 7. On March 18, 2020, we ordered petitioner to show cause within thirty days of the date of service of our order why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust his claims. ECF No. 8. More than thirty days have passed, and petitioner has failed to respond to our order. For the following reasons, we recommend that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.