(PC) Gibbs v. Shasta County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT A. GIBBS, No. 2:18-cv-2261 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se with a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a denial of his First Amendment rights, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks to challenge conditions of his prior confinement in the Shasta County Jail. However, plaintiff has filed a notice of address change indicating that he is no longer incarcerated. Therefore, he must complete and submit a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided herewith. See e.g. Adler v. Gonzalez, 2015 WL 4041772, at
The inmate locator website operated by the Shasta County Jail indicates that plaintiff is not presently incarcerated in that facility. See https://www.co.shasta.ca.us/index/sheriff/custody 25 The court has also verified that plaintiff is not incarcerated under the authority…