Kraus

Kraus v. Scurfield Family Limited Partnership

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20202:18-cv-00559California2,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY KRAUSS, No. 2:18-cv-00559-MCE-DB Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SCURFIELD FAMILY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP; DAVID SCURFIELD;

and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 17 This lawsuit was brought by Plaintiff Jerry Kraus (“Plaintiff”) under the provisions of both the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. (“ADA”), and California’s Unruh Civil Rights and Disabled Persons Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, hereinafter “Unruh Act”) on grounds that business establishments located on real property owned by Defendants Scurfield Family Limited Partnership and David Scurfield (collectively “Defendants”) contained barriers to access in contravention of both the ADA and the Unruh Act. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, made on grounds that Plaintiff is entitled, as a matter of law, to injunctive relief that Defendants provide accessible parking. In addition, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.