Le

(PS) Hanson v. Le

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20202:19-cv-00955California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. HANSON, No. 2:19-cv-00955-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIN NGOC LE, individually and dba D&V 96 Cent Store Plus; VAN THI TROUNG, individually and dba D&V 96 Cent Store Plus, 16 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Michael L. Hanson (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 1, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. /// /// /// Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.