Delaney
(PC) Magee v. Delaney
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE – No. 2:19-cv-1634 DB P
PREFILING ORDER,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 CAROLYN K. DELANEY, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. (ECF No. 1). His complaint has been lodged but not filed. This proceeding was 19 referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 For the reasons stated below the court shall preclude plaintiff from filing the instant 21 complaint on the grounds that: (1) plaintiff has been previously identified as a vexatious litigant, 22 and (2) plaintiff has failed to provide the prerequisite certification that his vexatious litigant status 23 24 As discussed, infra, plaintiff has been deemed a vexatious litigant. As a result, pleadings 25 brought by plaintiff are not to be filed. Instead, they are simply to be lodged in order to verify the existence of any prerequisite certification. See generally Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 26…