(PC) Micenheimer v. Kern Valley State Prison
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20201:19-cv-00115California3,154 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, 1:19-cv-00115-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF
vs. RULES 8(a) AND 18(a), WITH LEAVE
TO AMEND
KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., (ECF No. 15.)
Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT
EXCEEDING 25 PAGES
20 I. BACKGROUND Cory Dwayne Micenheimer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On February 11, 2019, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim and violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 7.) On July 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint, which is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. 1915A. (ECF 28 …