(PC) Micenheimer v. Kern Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20201:19-cv-00115California3,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, 1:19-cv-00115-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF

vs. RULES 8(a) AND 18(a), WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND

KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., (ECF No. 15.)

Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT

EXCEEDING 25 PAGES

20 I. BACKGROUND Cory Dwayne Micenheimer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On February 11, 2019, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim and violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 7.) On July 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint, which is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. 1915A. (ECF 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.