Kaur

(PC) Spence v. Kaur

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20202:16-cv-01828California1,925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-01828-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. KAUR, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Gerald Spence’s (“Plaintiff”) Request for Reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s Order denying in part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery and granting in part Defendant Kaur’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 83). (ECF No. 85.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that in 2016, while he was housed at California State Prison-Solano, Defendants Kaur (the Sr. Librarian) and Sgt. Chambers issued a 128-B and a CDCR-115 Rules Violation Report1 (“RVR”) against Plaintiff on false charges, in retaliation for 6 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.