Sherman

(PC) Denham v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20201:19-cv-01176California547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL JOHN DENHAM, No. 1:19-cv-01176-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

STU SHERMAN, Warden, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 21, 29)

17 Plaintiff Paul John Denham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 30, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. (Doc. No. 29.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due within fourteen days of service. (Id. at 3.) After receiving an extension of time to do so, plaintiff filed timely objections on May 4,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.