(PC) Howard v. Brown, Jr.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20201:18-cv-01710California1,248 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL ANTHONY HOWARD, Case No. 1:18-cv-01710-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS
v. LENO AND W. HANNA BE DISMISSED
FROM THIS ACTION, WITHOUT
SGT. ENCINAS, et al., PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(M)
Defendants. (ECF NOS. 17, 18, 19, & 39)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
17 I. BACKGROUND Michael Howard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims. This case now proceeds “on Plaintiff’s complaint filed November 19, 2018 (ECF No. 1), on the following claims: Plaintiff’s claim against defendants J. Flores, J. Alejo, R. Nichols, H. Rodriguez, A. Loza, Leno, and A. Encinas for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; Plaintiff’s claim against…