Pfeiffer
(PC) Struggs v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
22 Cedric Lynn Struggs (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 23 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 24 commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On November 27, 2018, Plaintiff paid the $400.00 filing 25 fee in full for this action. (Court Record.) 26 On September 25, 2019, the court screened the Complaint and dismissed it for failure to 27 state a claim and violation of Rule 18(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to 28 amend. (ECF No. 16.) On November 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 20.) On November 21, 2019, the court dismissed the First Amended Complaint for violation of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 21.) On January 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 23.) The court screened the Second Amended Complaint and issued an order on April 10, 2020, requiring Plaintiff to respond and show cause why the Second Amended Complaint should not be dismissed as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and Edwards v.…