(PC) Driver v. ADA 1824 Panels

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20201:19-cv-01718California974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-01718-DAD-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ORDER v. TO SHOW CAUSE, MOTION FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW, AND MOTION TO ADA 1824 PANELS, et al., SHOW CAUSE WHY PRESS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO COVER PROCEEINDGS Defendants. (ECF Nos. 30, 21, 32, 33) 16 Plaintiff Billy Driver, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s “motion seeking preliminary final approval of collective settlement(s), “motion for order to show cause,” “motion for expedited chief judge review,” motion for order to show cause why press should not be allowed to cover court proceedings, filed on March 12, 2020. (ECF Nos. 30, 31, 32, 33.) Plaintiff’s motions must be denied. First,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.