(SS) Badillo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20201:20-cv-00393California2,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECILIO BADILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING

PLAINTIFF TO FILE LONG FORM

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, APPLICATION AND SUPPORTING

DOCUMENTATION, OR PAY FILING FEE

Defendant. (ECF No. 6)

TWENTY-DAY DEADLINE

18 On March 16, 2020, Cecilio Badillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action seeking 19 review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. 20 (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to 21 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) On March 24, 22 2020, the Court reviewed Plaintiff’s application and found that it did not provide sufficient 23 information for the Court to determine if he was entitled to proceed in this action without 24 prepayment of fees. (ECF No. 3.) Specifically, Plaintiff’s initial IFP application proffered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.