(SS) Badillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20201:20-cv-00393California2,523 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CECILIO BADILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING
PLAINTIFF TO FILE LONG FORM
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, APPLICATION AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION, OR PAY FILING FEE
Defendant. (ECF No. 6)
TWENTY-DAY DEADLINE
18 On March 16, 2020, Cecilio Badillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action seeking 19 review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. 20 (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to 21 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) On March 24, 22 2020, the Court reviewed Plaintiff’s application and found that it did not provide sufficient 23 information for the Court to determine if he was entitled to proceed in this action without 24 prepayment of fees. (ECF No. 3.) Specifically, Plaintiff’s initial IFP application proffered…