Tufano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL TUFANO, individually and on No. 2:18-cv-03281-MCE-DB behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. 17 By way of this putative automobile insurance class action, Plaintiff contends that his insurer, State Farm, was required to pay both repair costs and the diminution in value to his vehicle following a collision with a fellow State Farm insured. The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s original Complaint for failure to state a claim, ECF No. 18, after which Plaintiff timely filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 19. Defendant has now moved to dismiss that FAC as well. ECF No. 22. For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED without further leave to amend.1 /// /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g). ANALYSIS2 2 …