(PS)Giddens

(PS)Giddens v. Solano County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20202:19-cv-00019California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GIDDENS, No. 2:19-cv-19-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SOLANO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 On March 11, 2020, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF Nos. 47 & 48. The court dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a claim, explained the deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unwilling or unable to cure the defects in the complaint. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim as set forth in the court’s March 11, 2020 order. ECF No. 48; see ECF No. 47. These findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.