(PS) Moore v. County of Sacramento, Dept.of Child, Family and Adult Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20202:19-cv-00844California6,543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OTIS T. MOORE, and No. 2:19-cv-844-JAM-KJN PS

KRISTINA A. MOORE,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiffs, ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE v. PLEADINGS 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, (ECF No. 23.) DEPARTMENT OF CHILD, FAMILY

AND ADULT SERVICES,

16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiffs Otis and Kristina Moore, proceeding pro se, allege the County of Sacramento wrongfully removed their grandchildren from their custody. Plaintiffs primarily claim their First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional rights were violated; they seek monetary and injunctive relief. (ECF No. 1.) The County now moves to dismiss, arguing that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear some of plaintiffs’ claims, all claims are time-barred, and the Complaint otherwise fails to state claims on which relief might be granted. (ECF No. 23.) For the reasons that follow, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.