(PS) Selck v. City of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:19-cv-341-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. 16 On March 24, 2020, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF Nos. 19 & 20. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, explained the deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unwilling or unable to cure the defects in the complaint. ///// ///// 26 1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at…