Pfeiffer

(HC) Phea v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20202:20-cv-00283California629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELANJE PHEA, No. 2:20-cv-00283 WBS GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER C. PFIEFFER, Warden, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 17. Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides that the petition: “shall specify all the grounds for relief which are available to the petitioner and of which he has or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have knowledge and shall set forth in summary form the facts supporting each of the grounds thus specified.” Rule 2(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Petitioner must also clearly state the relief sought in the petition. Id. Additionally, the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 explains that “notice pleading is not sufficient, for the petition is expected to state facts that point to a real possibility of constitutional error.” Advisory 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.