Glick
(PS) Lewis v. Glick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DERRICK JEROME LEWIS, No. 2:20-cv-346-TLN-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JAMES GLICK; SAFETYNET
WIRELESS; GINA THOMAS; VINCENT
THOMAS; and ERNEST MUNIUZ, Defendants. 17 On March 20, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, explained the deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. ECF No. 3. The order warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint could result in the dismissal of this action. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.2 24 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 25 undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 26 Although it appears from the file…