Hovsepyan

Hovsepyan v. Geico General Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20202:19-cv-00899California2,122 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAZMIK HOVSEPYAN, et al., No. 2:19-cv-00899-MCE-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

15 Defendant. 16 Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of certain documents. (ECF No. 19.) The court held a hearing on plaintiffs’ motion on May 13, 2020. Sheila Pendergast appeared for plaintiffs, and Suzanne Badawi appeared for defendant. Upon review of the record, the parties’ joint discovery letter, and the parties’ arguments, the court FINDS AS FOLLOWS: BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Razmik Hovsepyan, Suren Hovsepyan, and Shushanik Paskevichyan filed the present action1 alleging failure to act and respond to communications promptly; failure to effectuate a good faith, prompt, and fair settlement; failure to responsibly explain the denial of claim(s); and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. (ECF No. 1-1 at 2.) The

1 This diversity action was removed from state court on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.