Roat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN K. ROAT, No. 2:18–cv–1701–MCE–CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 30) CALIFORNIA EXPOSITION & STATE FAIR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This case concerned the alleged violations of plaintiff’s constitutional rights by defendants. (ECF No. 1.) Presently before the undersigned is defendants’ motion to enforce a settlement agreement. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff opposes, asserting the settlement agreement should contain additional language not contained in the parties’ draft written agreement. (ECF No. 31.) After thoroughly reviewing the parties’ briefs and considering their arguments, the court concurs with defendants’ position, and finds plaintiff’s version of the settlement agreement to contain extraneous, unnecessary, and potentially settlement-muddling language. Thus, the court GRANTS defendants’ motion to enforce. Further, because plaintiff continued to press his argument after the undersigned informed plaintiff at the…