Price

(HC) Townsend v. Price

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20202:20-cv-00333California311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REBIO RONNIE TOWNSEND, No. 2:20-cv-00333-TLN-EFB Petitioner, v. ORDER BRANDON PRICE, Respondent. 16 Rebio Ronnie Townsend (“Petitioner”), an individual civilly committed at Coalinga State Hospital and proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 9, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) Petitioner has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.