(PC) Dynes v. Mule Creek State Prison Medical Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN RAY DYNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00246-DAD-JDP
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR
v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
KEN CLARK, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS
Defendants. ECF No.
17 Plaintiff John Ray Dynes is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges Eighth Amendment violations arising from his medical treatment at Mule Creek State Prison. On April 7, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s original complaint and found that failed to state a claim, noting among other things that the “complaint does not describe the actions of any individuals who treated him” and thus failed to allege a constitutional violation. ECF No. 6 at 3. On April 17, the court received a first amended complaint. ECF No. 7. On April 29, we screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and…