Sandoval

(PC) Randolph v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20201:18-cv-00968California1,156 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00968-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

v. DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

C. SANDOVAL, et al., (Doc. No. 18) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Colin M. Randolph is a state prisoner at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”) proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 19, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action proceed on plaintiff’s second amended complaint for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment against defendants Benavides and Carrillo and for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against defendants Sandoval, Speidell, and Benavides; that plaintiff’s “supplemented complaint”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.