Hallmon

Hallmon v. Stanislaus County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20201:19-cv-01623California550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 BRITANIE HALLMON, Case No. 1:19-cv-1623-DAD-EPG 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT ALL CLAIMS v. BE DISMISSED, EXCEPT FOR PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST HER

STANISLAUS COUNTY HUMAN EMPLOYER, STANISLAUS COUNTY,

RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, et al., FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION

UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL

Defendants. RIGHTS ACT OF 1964

(ECF Nos. 12, 13)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 On August 23, 2019, Plaintiff, Britanie Hallmon (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se and in 18 forma pauperis, commenced this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 19 2000e-5 (“Title VII”), alleging claims against Stanislaus County Human Resource Department 20 (the “County”), and the individuals Tamra Thomas, Mari Tamimi, Shelly Anntonucci, and Joan 21 Sahard (the “Individual Defendants”). (ECF No. 1). This action was initially brought in the 22 Northern District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.