Hallmon
Hallmon v. Stanislaus County
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20201:19-cv-01623California550 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 BRITANIE HALLMON, Case No. 1:19-cv-1623-DAD-EPG 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT ALL CLAIMS v. BE DISMISSED, EXCEPT FOR PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST HER
STANISLAUS COUNTY HUMAN EMPLOYER, STANISLAUS COUNTY,
RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, et al., FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION
UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL
Defendants. RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
(ECF Nos. 12, 13)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
17 On August 23, 2019, Plaintiff, Britanie Hallmon (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se and in 18 forma pauperis, commenced this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 19 2000e-5 (“Title VII”), alleging claims against Stanislaus County Human Resource Department 20 (the “County”), and the individuals Tamra Thomas, Mari Tamimi, Shelly Anntonucci, and Joan 21 Sahard (the “Individual Defendants”). (ECF No. 1). This action was initially brought in the 22 Northern District…