Robles

Robles v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20202:17-cv-01580California1,092 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO ROBLES, No. 2:17-cv-01580-JAM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; SHERIFF SCOTT JONES, in his official capacity, DEPUTY HARDY (Badge No. 1434), DEPUTY DANIEL (Badge No. 645), DEPUTY MOVAHAN (Badge No. 452), DEPUTY PAM (Badge No. 31), SGT. M. LOPEZ (Badge No. 179), DEPUTY MATOON (Badge No. 1095), OFFICER S. ROBY (Badge No. 529), and Does 1- 40, inclusive , 20 Defendants. 21 Pablo Robles (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against the County of Sacramento (“the County” or “Defendant”), alleging Defendant unlawfully imprisoned him without charges after a DUI arrest on April 3, 2016. First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 18. Defendant thereafter filed a motion for summary judgment. Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 32. Plaintiff opposed the motion. ECF No. 36. The Court held oral argument on Defendant’s motion on February 11, 2020. The Court ruled from the bench and denied Defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.