Beard
(PC) Wilhelm v. Beard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE WILHELM, A.K.A. STEVEN No. 2:18-cv-1125 DB P
HAIRL WILHELM,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to this court 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 11, 2020, having screened the instant complaint, the undersigned determined 21 that plaintiff had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Consequently, he was 22 ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (See ECF No. 9). Thereafter, thirty 23 days passed, and plaintiff neither filed an amended complaint nor responded to the court’s order 24 in any way. 25 As a result of plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order, on April 7, 2020, the 26 court issued an order directing plaintiff to show cause within thirty days…