Benkle

(PC) Harris v. Benkle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20202:20-cv-00880California2,807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID D. HARRIS, No. 2:20-cv-0880 DB P Plaintiff, FAYE BENKLE, ORDER Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff’s complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and finds plaintiff fails to state a cognizable claim under § 1983. Plaintiff will be given an opportunity to amend his complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.