CDCR

(PC) Connor v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20202:19-cv-02088California1,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA A. CONNOR, No. 2:19-cv-2088-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court screened plaintiff’s original complaint, found that plaintiff had failed to state sufficient facts to support her constitutional claim and failed to allege facts that would enable the court to determine the appropriate venue for the case, and directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, which is before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), as plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. I. Screening A. Requirement and Standards Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.