(PC) Carr v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20201:17-cv-01769California1,580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLAUDE CARR, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED, WITHOUT

TED PRUITT, ) PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO RULE 56(D) ) Defendant. ) (ECF Nos. 56, 58) ) )

Plaintiff Claude Carr is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed on April 17, 2020. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding on a claim against Ted Pruitt (“Defendant”) for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF Nos. 14, 15.) More specifically, Plaintiff alleges that on June 21, 2016, while he was performing his job as a waste manager in the Prison Industry Authority…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.