Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20201:16-cv-01066California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES

vs. IN COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 62.) BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al.,

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY

Defendants. DEADLINE AND DEADLINE TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS FOR ALL

PARTIES

New Discovery Deadline: October 2, 2020

New Dispositive Motions Deadline: December 2, 2020 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betts, for inadequate medical care under the Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.