Walker
Walker v. Police Chief
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Case No. 1:19-cv-01546-NONE-SKO
HAROLD WALKER,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE Plaintiff, ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S v. ORDER AND FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM
POLICE CHIEF JOHN DOE, et al., (Doc. 13) Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
13 Plaintiff Harold Walker, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint against the City of Fresno, eight officers of the Fresno Police Department and three employees of Grocery Outlet on October 31, 2019. (Doc. 1.) In his original Complaint, attempted to plead claims for “making false statement[s] to police,” false arrest, “false prosecution,” excessive force, and municipal liability in violation of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and rights under the California Constitution. (Id. at 5–7.) On December 12, 2019, the Complaint was…