Saechao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES FAULTRY, No. 2:18-cv-1850 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. SAECHAO, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a California state prisoner who proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff pursues claims of excessive force, failure-to-protect, conspiracy and retaliation against CSP-SAC correctional officers Saechao and Shirley. Plaintiff has filed motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel. ECF Nos. 30, 34. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies both motions. II. Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery The Discovery and Scheduling Order set a discovery deadline in this case of August 30, 2019. See ECF No. 22. The order provided in pertinent part that all requests for discovery were

The undersigned has recently issued findings and recommendations in this case that recommend the dismissal of…