Estate of Tyler S. Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC et al., 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC.,

et al., Defendants. 16 By way of this action, Plaintiffs seek to recover for injuries sustained as a result of a fatal altercation between Tyler S. Rushing (“Decedent”) and various named Defendants, which include employees of a private security firm as well as members of the Chico Police Department and the Butte County Sheriff’s Office (generally referred to as “Defendants”). The Court previously denied a Motion for Summary Adjudication (ECF No. 23) brought by Plaintiffs as to the discrete issue of whether one Defendant, Officer Alex Fliehr, (“Officer Fliehr”) used excessive force when he used his taser against Decedent after Decedent had been shot. ECF No. 35. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration of that Order. ECF No. 36. For the following reasons, the Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED as well.1…