(SS) Shade v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20202:19-cv-01122California3,123 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH GAIL SHADE, No. 2:19-cv-1122-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

v. REMANDING FOR FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 15, 16.) 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Elizabeth Gail Shade seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment, arguing that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) failed to support his Step Five analysis with substantial evidence. The Commissioner filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, contending the ALJ’s analysis was fully supported. After carefully considering the record and the parties’ briefing, the court DENIES the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.