(PS) Peccia v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20202:18-cv-03049California1,738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAKE PECCIA, No. 2:18-cv-03049 JAM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND REHABILITATION Defendant. 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (ECF No. 28) and plaintiff’s motion to quash (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff is appearing in pro se. This discovery matter is before the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(1) and 302(c)(21). Defendant opposes both motions. ECF No. 32. Plaintiff has replied. ECF No. 33. Upon review of all arguments, plaintiff’s motions are DENIED. I. Relevant Background Plaintiff filed this discrimination and retaliation case against his former employer, the State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) on November 26, 2018. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has also been employed at the American Red Cross (“ARC”). Peccia 27 Plaintiff was initially…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.