Satterfield

(PC) Fernandez v. Satterfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20201:19-cv-01220California974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE FERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01220-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SATTERFIELD, et al., (Doc. 26)

Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE

16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “motion for emergency injunctive relief.” (Doc. 26.) The Court construes Plaintiff’s filing as a motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that Plaintiff’s motion be denied. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Plaintiff contends the four defendants in this action—Correctional Officers Satterfield, Eslick, Jackson, and Salzer—plus ten other correctional officers at Sierra Conservation Center are “under penalty of perjury” and have conspired to harass and retaliate against him. (See Doc. 26 at 2.) Plaintiff alleges that an inmate assaulted him on April 14, 2020 at the direction of these officers, “yet Plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.