Satterfield
(PC) Fernandez v. Satterfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE FERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01220-DAD-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
SATTERFIELD, et al., (Doc. 26)
Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE
16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “motion for emergency injunctive relief.” (Doc. 26.) The Court construes Plaintiff’s filing as a motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that Plaintiff’s motion be denied. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Plaintiff contends the four defendants in this action—Correctional Officers Satterfield, Eslick, Jackson, and Salzer—plus ten other correctional officers at Sierra Conservation Center are “under penalty of perjury” and have conspired to harass and retaliate against him. (See Doc. 26 at 2.) Plaintiff alleges that an inmate assaulted him on April 14, 2020 at the direction of these officers, “yet Plaintiff was…