Usher

(PC) Bradford v. Usher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20201:17-cv-01128California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

4.417 VV VLLEO WIAD MVVULTICEI VO □□□ tlicy Paye +vrst

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01128-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO

V. ) DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER

C. OGBUEHI, et al, ) [ECF No. 67]

9 Defendants. ) )

11 Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperi 13 || in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 19, 2020, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendants’ answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 67 The Court has not ordered any reply to Defendants’ answer in this case. Federal Rule of Civ 16 || Procedure 7 lists all pleadings that are permitted, including “if the court orders one, a reply to ¢ 17 || answer.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a)(7) (emphasis added). No request to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.