(PC) Henderson v. CDCR Director

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20202:17-cv-02121California459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM MARTIN HENDERSON, No. 2:17-cv-2121 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CDCR DIRECTOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 6, 2019, the undersigned screened the instant complaint and determined that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (See ECF No. 26). As a result, plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (See id. at 6-7). Plaintiff neither filed an amended complaint, nor did he respond to the court’s order in any way. On April 14, 2020, the undersigned directed plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.