Loadholt

(PC) Patton v. Loadholt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20202:19-cv-00451California283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. PATTON, No. 2: 19-cv-0451 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed March 5, 2020, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 form necessary to effect service on defendant Vidal Sanchez. That sixty days day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge to this action; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Vidal Sanchez be dismissed. These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.