Abdur-Rahman

(PC) Parks v. Abdur-Rahman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20202:19-cv-01589California304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, No. 2:19-cv-1589-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SALAHUDDIN ABDUR-RAHMAN, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests that the court reconsider its denial of his motion to appoint counsel. 18 ECF No. 30. As the court’s prior order informed plaintiff, district courts lack authority to require 19 counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. 20 Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney 21 to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 22 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). 23 When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider the 24 likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.