Woodward
(PC) Brown v. Woodward
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00626-DAD-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE A SECOND AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY THE COURT
OF HIS DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON
D. WOODWARD, et al., CLAIMS FOUND COGNIZABLE
Defendants. (Doc. 15)
21-DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff James Brown alleges the defendants subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment and retaliation. (Doc. 15.) The Court finds that Plaintiff states cognizable claims of deliberate indifference against Defendants Woodward and Lopez, as well as cognizable claims of excessive force and retaliation against Defendant Woodward. Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining defendants are not cognizable, and Plaintiff may not seek expungement of his rules violation report because it would affect the length of his incarceration. See Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 856 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the Court…