Moffett

(PC) Bland v. Moffett

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20201:19-cv-01750California436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01750-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v.

DEFENDANTS

D. MOFFETT, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign a District Judge 16 On April 6, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found that it states a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendant Moffett and cognizable failure to protect claims against Defendants Jaime and Stark. (Doc. 8.) The Court found that Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state cognizable claims against the remaining defendants. (Id.) Therefore, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 21 days, to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in its order or notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. (Id. at 7.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to comply with its order would result in a recommendation that this action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.