Ciolli

(PC) Luedtke v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20201:20-cv-00406California363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LUEDTKE, No. 1:20-cv-00406-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE DENIED

CIOLLI, et al., (Doc. Nos. 10, 11) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff James Luedtke is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 14, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for a court order addressing the quality and quantity of food served at the institution where he is currently incarcerated. (Doc. No. 10.) The assigned magistrate judge construed plaintiff’s filing as a motion for preliminary injunction, and on April 15, 2020, issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.