Neuschmid

(HC) Jackson v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20201:20-cv-00198California1,166 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY PECK JACKSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-00198-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PETITION AS UNTIMELY AND

v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

CLAIM

ROBERT NEUSCHMID, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS

Respondents. ECF No. 1

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE 18 Petitioner Gregory Peck Jackson, a state prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Petitioner claims that California’s procedure for initiating a criminal case by felony complaint is improper. Id. at 15. On April 2, 2020, we ordered petitioner to show cause within thirty days of the date of service of our order why the petition should not be dismissed as untimely and for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 10. More than thirty days have passed, and petitioner has failed to respond to our order. For the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.