Wright

Wright v. USAA Savings Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20202:19-cv-00591California3,863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 VANESSA WRIGHT, No. 2:19-cv-00591 WBS CKD Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

USAA SAVINGS BANK; USAA FEDERAL JUDGMENT

SAVINGS BANK,

16 Defendants.

18 ----oo0oo---- 19 Charles Wright filed this action against defendants 20 USAA Savings Bank (“USAA SB”) and USAA Federal Savings Bank 21 (“USAA FSB”) alleging that defendants auto-dialed calls to 22 plaintiff’s cellphone without his consent in violation of the 23 Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et 24 seq., and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 25 (“Rosenthal Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1788, et seq. Before the 26 court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. 27 (Docket Nos. 36 & 37.) 28 I. Factual Background Mr. Wright applied for, and was approved for, at least one credit card with USAA Savings Bank. (Defs.’ Resp. to Pl.’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (“SUF”) at 1:6-10 (Docket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.