Juarez

(PC) Stuckey v. Juarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20201:18-cv-01557California1,590 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY, No. 1:18-cv-01557-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

WITHDRAW CONSENT TO JURISDICTION

v. OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE J. JUAREZ, et al., (Doc. No. 41) Defendants. 16 PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Andrew Kenneth Stuckey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action on November 13, 2018. (Doc. No. 1.) On December 3, 2018, plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes. (Doc. No. 10.) On March 27, 2019, the magistrate judge screened plaintiff complaint, and found that plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendants Chanelo and Peacock for violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment but failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other defendants. (Doc. No. 12.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.