Wolf

(HC) Zambrano v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20201:20-cv-00595California1,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCIAL BRAVO ZAMBRANO, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00595-DAD-JLT Petitioners, v. ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION

AS TO PETITIONERS VILLALOBOS AND

CHAD F. WOLF, et al., SPITZAUER, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DUE

TO LACK OF JURISDICITON

Respondents. (Doc. No. 1)

17 18 Pending before the court is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed on behalf of petitioners Jorge Villalobos and Michael Spitzauer (“petitioners”). (Doc. No. 1) The petition is based upon the risks to petitioners posed by the ongoing coronavirus (“COVID-19”) outbreak. (Id.) For the reasons set forth below, the petition will be dismissed, without prejudice, due to a lack of jurisdiction in this court. /////

Three petitioners initiated this case by filing a single petition with this court. (Doc. No. 1). 26 Pursuant to the joint stipulation filed by petitioner Marcial Bravo Zambrano and respondents (Doc. No. 4), the court stayed this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.