(PS) Whitsitt v. Select Staffing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20202:18-cv-01866California865 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 2:18-cv-1866 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SELECT STAFFING; COSTCO

WHOLESALE MEATS,

15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff William Whitsitt is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 30, 2019, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to supply the U.S. Marshall with the documents necessary to serve defendants with process and to file a statement confirming submission of the necessary documents within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 10 at 2.) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to timely comply could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 4.) Plaintiff was also issued a letter that same day advising plaintiff that Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures provides that if a defendant is not served within 90 days, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.