Rodriguez
(PC) Morris v. Rodriguez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CONDALEE MORRIS, No. 2:18-cv-2849-WBS-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 21, 2020, defendants Ortiz, Clough, Murillo, Allison and Rodriguez filed a motion to dismiss. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. In cases in which one party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, motions ordinarily are submitted on the record without oral argument. Local Rule 230(l). “Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed by the responding party not more than twenty-one (21), days after the date of service of the motion.” Id. A responding party’s failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the…