(PS) Starr v. Ortega Gonzalez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20202:19-cv-02576California1,493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBIN GILLEN STARR, No. 2:19-cv-02576-TLN-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

AND ORDER STAYING THE CASE

v. SOPHIA ORTEGA GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who proceeds without counsel in this action, was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) While granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 4.) The determination that a plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the court is directed to dismiss the case at any time if it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. A federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.